感悟投稿篇一：生活感悟投稿郵箱

一些地址:

《大眾日報》：

“大眾周末”郭愛鳳：dzgaf@sina.com

“豐收”副刊，劉君：jk3407@163.com

《齊魯晚報》：

“青未了”副刊，張成東：qlqwl@163169.net

“人間”、“生活廣記”曲鵬：www3163@163169.net

《生活日報》：

“大家專欄”、“大家小品”宜冰：ybyb9@163.com

“情感·傾訴”鹿玲：ll@mail.dzdaily.com.cn

《都市信報》：

“心情筆記”李毅：liy@mail.dzdaily.com.cn

“男左女右”、“非常故事”李毅：liy@mail.dzdaily.com.cn

《濟南時報》：

“海右”副刊聶雙：sbfkb@163.com

“國風”（雜文）束學(xué)山：shuxs28@hotmail.com

“市井”（千字內(nèi)的小故事）竇小娟：douzi71@hotmail.com

《青島日報》編輯部

工交部 投稿E-mail：rbgjb@qingdaonews.com 財貿(mào)部 投稿E-mail：rbcmb@qingdaonews.com

農(nóng)村部 投稿E-mail：rbncb@qingdaonews.com 政法部 投稿E-mail：rbzfb@qingdaonews.com

科教部 投稿E-mail：rbkjb@qingdaonews.com 文藝部 投稿E-mail：rbwyb@qingdaonews.com

理論部 投稿E-mail：rbllb@qingdaonews.com 群工部 投稿E-mail：rbqgb@qingdaonews.com

攝影部 投稿E-mail：rbsyb@qingdaonews.com 總編室 投稿E-mail：rbzbs@qingdaonews.com

特刊部 投稿E-mail：rbtkb@qingdaonews.com 新聞研究室 投稿E-mail：rbxwyjs@qingdaonews.com

外宣部 投稿E-mail：rbwxb@qingdaonews.com 時事部 投稿E-mail：rbssb@qingdaonews.com

感悟投稿篇二：詳細投稿歷程及感悟

詳細投稿歷程及感悟（轉(zhuǎn)）

管理提醒: 本帖被 何會文 從 論文資源 移動到本區(qū)(2009-12-15)

前天收到編輯來信,一篇文章被接受了,影響因子剛過2,雖然不是很高,還是讓人高興.主要是這個領(lǐng)域不是博士期間工作的繼續(xù),做起來總有種摸著石頭過河的感覺.回顧這篇文章的投稿歷程,有些感悟,寫出來與各位交流:

大體的投稿歷程:

3.18初投 過了幾天助理編輯回信說格式要改,這個比較意外,因為以前有篇文章在該期刊上發(fā)過,格式是一樣的,看來期刊的投稿要求也會變,沒辦法,改.

3.23投出,3.25編輯處理

4.10收到審稿意見 (有些內(nèi)容用符號代替):

Dear Dr LLLL

Reviewers have now commented on your paper. You will see that they are advising that you revise your manuscript. If you are prepared to undertake the work required, I would be pleased to reconsider my decision.

……

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer #1: The paper is acceptable with major technical revision.

The authors report the first theoretical calculations of AB, revealing three equilibrium structures, the most stable structure of which has an interaction between the hydrogen atom with a hydride character and the aluminum atom.The transiti

on states of the isomerization between the three structures are also calculated.Solvent effects on the structures of the three iso(來自:smilezhuce.com 蒲公 英文 摘:感悟投稿)mers are also predicted, even though the effects are concluded to be small.These findings are of importance as basic knowledge about XXX of group 13 elements, which were not investigated.Therefore, the reviewer thinks that the manuscript is worth publishing in the Journal of ...Before publication, the following remarks should be addressed:

1)The last sentence in the introduction is not suitable for an introduction and should be moved to the conclusion.

2)p2, line 5 from the bottom: The ground states of CC are usually triplet, while those of GG are usually singlet. Therefore, the term "Similar" here is not appropriate.Perhaps they should use the term "Unlike", instead of "Similar to".References concerning each of the ground states should be cited.

3) p3, line 9: The reviewer thinks that 0.006 ? is within an acceptable margin of error and is not worth discussing.Therefore, the phrase starting from "indicating" should be revised.

4) p3, line 5 from the bottom: The reviewer cannot understand that complex 2, having a very weak interaction between the Ge and Al atoms, has the obvious character of a GG.In contrast, he can understand that complex 1 has the obvious character of a GG.Therefore, additional explanations about the structure of complex 2 should be demonstrated.

5) Before consideration of the structures of the present complex, the reviewer thinks that the transition states for the formation of the complex from A and B should be discussed,

because the complex is generated from A and B.

Reviewer #2: Routine calculations are performed for the three isomers of AB and isomerization of these isomers. However, this may be publishable, after the following points are made clearer.

(1) Only three isomers are located for AB. It seems that there is one more isomer that originates from the exchange of one hydrogen and the Cl1 atom in complex 1. Did the authors perform the full search?

(2) Do the authors assume that complexes 1-3 are formed by the reaction of A and B? If so, the reaction path should be presented.

(3) It is suggested that complex 2 is the predominant form of AB. The authors should mention how complex 2 is efficient as a cyclopropanating reagent, since this is an important goal of this manuscript.

(4) P. 2, Line 5 from the bottom. Obviously, the ground state of CC is not singlet but triplet.

(5) For binding energies, could the authors present also the BSSE (basis-set-superposition-error) corrected values.

下面是4.13修改回信:

Dear Professor TTT:

Thank you very much for giving us a chance to respond to the Referees’ reviews and we would like to thank the referees for their nice comments on our manuscript. We have considered the comments of Referees’ and made some changes

in the manuscript. Our changes and response are presented in the following. Thank you for your time and your consideration of this paper. Should there be any questions or suggestions, please feel free to contact me by e-mail at …

1. Response to comment (1) of Reviewer #1

Considering the Reviewer’s suggestion, the last sentence in the introduction has been moved to the conclusion.

2. Response to comment (2) of Reviewer #1 and comment

(4) of Reviewer #2:

Considering the suggestions of Reviewers’, the term "Similar to " has been changed to be the term "Unlike" and two References [49] and [50] have been added.

3. Response to comment (3) of Reviewer #1:

Considering the Reviewer’s suggestion, the sentence “The G-A bond length of complex 1 is 0.006A shorter than that of Y, indicating that the interaction between G and A in complex 1 is a bit stronger than in Y.” has been changed to be “The G-A bond length of complex 1 is only 0.006A shorter than that of Y, indicating that the interaction between G and

A in complex 1 is similar to that in Y.”

4. Response to comment (4) of Reviewer #1

We thank the reviewer’s criticism and indeed the previous depiction was not appropriate. Therefore we deleted the sentence “indicating that complex 2 has obvious character of g...”. We do not think that the deletion affect the description for complex 2 and influence the conclusion of the manuscript.

5. Response to comment (5) of Reviewer #1 and comment

(2) of Reviewer #2:

We understand the Reviewers’ suggestions. However, we did not add any content about the raction of A and B. The reasons are following:

a) Though the germylenoid AB could be considered as the complex of A with B, the reaction of A and B are not easy and in fact it is not a feasible way to generating germylenoid AB by using the reaction of A and B. (until now there are not any stable gg being prepared by experiments) So we do not think it is necessary to study the reaction path of A and B.

b) In previous similar studies on cc, ss, and gg, the reactions of A and B had been not studied. We do not think it would influence the conclusions of the present manuscripte without the study on the reaction of A and B.

6. Response to comment (1) of Reviewer #2

We performed the full search. The calculations indicated that the possible “isomer” which the Reviewer #2 suggested has two imaginary frequencies and we conclude that it is not a isomer of AB.

7. Response to comment (3) of Reviewer #2

The main goal of the manuscript is the exploring on the possible structure of the germylenoid AB in gas phase and some solvents. Of course, “which structure is an efficient cyclopropanating reagent and how the cyclopropanation reactions occur” are interesting topics. However, we consider these interesting topics are outside of the scale of the present manuscript. So we did not add any interrelated content.

8. Response to comment (5) of Reviewer #2

The binding energies did not include the BSSE corrected en

感悟投稿篇三：APL投稿感悟

APPLIED PHYSICS LETTERS APL作為應(yīng)用物理最高期刊 出版周期 Weekly

期刊主頁網(wǎng)址: http://apl.aip.org/

在線投稿網(wǎng)址:

投過一篇，發(fā)現(xiàn)被直接拒稿。后來才想明白，原來投稿系統(tǒng)中可能有個功能，看看有沒有引用APL的文獻，如果沒有，那就直接被拒了。編輯發(fā)給我的信中，也直接這樣寫了，說還是投到你引用的期刊上發(fā)表吧。

科研不知APL，投遍論文也枉然！實驗室的老師和師兄師姐們論文投稿的第一選擇都是ＡＰＬ，錄了很多篇了，自己做了一個小東西，有點創(chuàng)意，但和拼指標的論文相比，相距甚遠！在老師的鼓勵下，寫了份詳細的稿件，老師看后，提出三點，也就是ＡＰＬ的精髓：Ａ代表應(yīng)用背景擴展，Ｐ代表物理模型解析，Ｌ代表新穎性和創(chuàng)新性。論文的重中之重要先Ｌ，再Ｐ，最后Ａ！自己在這樣的思路指導(dǎo)下，堅決執(zhí)行Ｌ-Ｐ-Ａ順序?qū)φ撐拈_始重新組織：Ｌ是老師給指出來；Ｐ的話，花了很長時間，大概一個多月，讀了３０多篇相關(guān)文章，模型根基才算打牢；和老師商量了Ａ，再把圖片一個個的清晰化（很關(guān)鍵），前后２個月，完成文章！投出去后，趕上圣誕節(jié)，到大年初二，意見回來：

Reviewer #1 (Comments to the Author):

This is a useful contribution to the field. It should be published "as is".

這是個比較快的雜志，收和拒都很快的，如果你做的比較有新意，可以選擇投稿，去年投了一篇，修了兩次接受大概用了3各月，今年投了兩篇，一篇投稿四天后直接接受（這個有一定運氣成分，但這篇文章準備了一年半，之前修改的比較多了）

一共投稿五次，中了兩篇，一篇送審。文章要有很新的物理思想，倘若結(jié)果不好，就要看論文通篇的寫法。最近幾年，稿件的標準有所提高，最通常的原因往往是因為稿件缺乏深刻的物理內(nèi)涵。所以最適合投稿APL的工作是，有足夠的創(chuàng)新性，并且通過深入談?wù)�，得出非常明了、直接的結(jié)論。

APL老牌雜志，影響廣泛。 因為存在pre-screening，編輯直接拒稿率較高。一個審稿人，存在較大隨機性，不過一般審的都不錯（畢竟是老牌雜志，審稿人數(shù)據(jù)庫比較完善）。個人認為要比nano letters等“家族”式期刊更具參考價值。其論文被引用總量在SCI期刊也是佼佼者。值得投稿！

材料類全球權(quán)威期刊，去年中了一篇，前后大修2次，小修1次，APL審稿速度很快，從投遞初稿，到修改，接收，整個來回將近20天。最大的感觸就是APL的摘要需要限制在100個單詞之內(nèi)

APL上面的文章，比較強調(diào)時效性、與應(yīng)用和實驗研究掛鉤。好處是剛出來時候看的人多，缺點是讀者興趣隨時間快速衰減。與它互補的有發(fā)表長篇的J. Appl.

Phys. (JAP)。

APL是二類雜志中比較好的。特點是研究內(nèi)容容新，具有應(yīng)用背景�，F(xiàn)在是一個人審稿，審稿速度超快。文章的觀點明確，內(nèi)容較短。內(nèi)容新穎，具有物理思想的文章中APL比較容易。

應(yīng)用物理類的最好期刊，要求的東西比較新，而且有一點的物理思想。1要足夠Applied，沒有應(yīng)用背景的文章比較難中， 2要有Physics，沒有物理思想，或者物理思想不清晰的文章會比較困難，3是Lett，就是要新，別人沒做過的。

相關(guān)熱詞搜索：感悟 投稿 人生感悟投稿 業(yè)務(wù)員感悟投稿